I’ve said it for years, and it’s just as relevant today as it ever was, perhaps more so. If you vote for a school levy, you’re stupid. That’s what Darryl Parks and I always said on WLW radio when I was a frequent guest. Many of our old interviews are still on my YouTube site, where we talked about why in a thousand different ways. When he was the program director for Clear Channel Radio, we spent many hours discussing what had come true in public education today, well before anybody else realized it, and nobody can’t say that they weren’t told. It was just an inconvenient truth that nobody wanted to admit to. When they thought of public school, they thought about school jackets, class rings, homecoming dances, and the social aspects of being around other kids. But public school designed by socialists, Marxists, and outright communists under John Dewey was never intended to teach anybody anything useful. It was always about social controls that would last the duration of people’s lives with liberalized sentiment and submission to authority, which served the notion of big centralized governments. And the entire system has collapsed on itself. Finally, people have admitted that sending their kids to public schools was something they’d instead not do if they could get away with it. Suppose they could afford a private school or some other alternative. And that is the state now where there are massive waiting lists for alternative schools to the government school option at the center of everyone’s community. It’s taken many years, and COVID was the final straw, but people have finally admitted that the public school option is one they’d love to get away from for the benefit of their children. Based on what we know now, if you are choosing to send your kid to public school, it’s more for your convenience than that you love them. Nobody would choose to send a kid to a public school and, in the same sentence, mean it when you said to them, “I love you.” Those things do not go together.
And so it goes; knowing all that, my wife and I were shopping at Bridgewater Falls in Fairfield, and we noticed all the yard signs advocating for a new tax levy for Fairfield Schools. Fairfield is a school district neighboring Lakota, where I live, and they have been flirting with a new levy in Lakota for several years. Public schools were designed to burden a community, so everyone has to go through a kind of divorce with their government schools where property values are perceived to be directly connected. For years, it has been thought that people move into or out of a community based on the quality of the schools. That’s what real estate people will tell you anyway, but that has, too, been a lazy way to manage school districts. Government schools that are controlled by radical leftist teacher unions with consistently high wage rates in mind have no means to generate more money to pay their staff but ever-increasing burdens on their property taxes. So the game continued; home values would increase, making more taxable revenue available for the government schools to confiscate. That money is then used to program the next generation of children into the ways of Democrat politics, anti-God sentiments, transgender bathrooms, and racial politics, making for much of their youth, future Democrat voters. Public schools are essentially teaching anti-family and a replacement of domestic concerns with obedience to centralized government.
So the longer a community survives this process, the more burden and expensive those government schools become before there is a collapse, and the following community with the next shiny thing becomes the new destination, leaving the old community behind and used up. That has been the story of several communities around Butler County, especially Fairfield, where I have much experience. My wife and I were married and went to church there for many years when it was a destination community for many people all over the country. I have watched this government school game for a long time, and behind it all is the communist intention to attack private ownership. We are seeing this trend in Liberty Township, within the Lakota district now, where apartments and lower-cost living seek to attract lower-income people who don’t own so much private property. It’s not a massive conspiracy; I know all the trustees involved. They are nice enough guys. But it’s in the handbook of community development, written by the same dumb people from the United Nations who designed these horrible public schools. What could go wrong with a community entirely of apartments and people who vote but don’t own property? Then, people who own property are squeezed out of their homes with high taxes, and before you know it, the tax rates are too high and unmanageable, and people move away once their children grow up and start lives of their own somewhere else. In the background of all these apartments and condos is the hope that the children will stay in the community when they grow up if only affordable options exist. But what you end up with is Democrat voters until they grow up and take on more responsibility by starting a family of their own. So they vote for school levies, but their landlords end up having to pay the taxes, and the schools achieve one of Karl Marx’s goals: the destruction of all private property. We have seen this cycle everywhere, and Fairfield has suffered from it. Most of their best companies picked up and left because the taxes were too high, the same story that could be told in every community around Butler County, Ohio, for the last four or five decades. The Lakota schools are watching if any of these levies pass so they can try independently for their own. We have managed to keep the taxes low in Lakota because plenty of people have a hostile reaction to the prospect of higher property taxes. However, the system was built to fail in every way, providing a tempting lure to busy parents, free babysitting while they work, and dual income lives to pay for all this mess.
However, changes are coming with another Trump administration; serious reforms to public education will happen by eliminating the Department of Education, which should have occurred during the Reagan administration. But the communists fought to prevent it with the standard fear tactics, which Reagan listened to. And so we have had this uncompetitive socialist model ever since, and Trump is poised to change it. And to that point, the most apparent change will be that any federal dollars will follow the child, not the zip code. That will mean that Fairfield, Lakota, Mason, and several other government schools along the outer loop of I-275 will have to fight to have children in their schools to access the funds that come with them. And their cost structure will be challenged severely, which would be great. Many teachers at Lakota schools make over six figures, which is a big part of their quarter of a billion-dollar yearly budget. If you have attended a school event anywhere lately, you will see many of these teachers can afford to miss a sandwich or two. They are not specimens of excellent health, let’s just put it nicely. The entire system is poised to fail, whether levies are approved or not. And knowing all that, if you vote for a school levy, as I have said for several decades, you are stupid. It’s silly to vote for any public school for more money that they are just going to waste on radical Democrat teachers. And until we change that, it’s stupid to give them even a penny more.
Rich Hoffman
Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707