I’m not a big Jesus guy, I love his dad. But I’m not OK with the peace and love that Jesus is always talking about in the New Testament. This idea of the Fall in the Garden being redeemed by Jesus dying on the cross for all our sins sounds to me like a Greek and Roman desire politically to control the mass population for the preservation of their imperial perspective. I prefer the Old Testament and the wrath of Yahweh to the anti-ownership and anti-wealth sentiment in the New Testament. I grew up with such religious assumptions, but over the years and after traveling a time or two to Asia to see things for myself, I think there is a big piece of the story in the Bible that is missing from its regional perspective, which is directly applicable and is being exploited in a very modern way. I think Jesus studied the Hindu religion as it is articulated by the blue skin of the poisoned Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita, which is essentially part of book 6 of the Mahabharata. The Hindu religion actually goes back to the days of Abraham emerging from Mesopotamia, so these influences along the Silk Road are pretty obvious, and so are the many contextual references to Jesus in the many war-torn areas of that part of the world that seem very intent to conceal this information. Apparently, the Vatican knows all about Jesus studying in India, and by the time he came along, Buddhism was already 500 years old. So the New Testament starts to make a lot more sense when you understand how its perspective was influenced along the Silk Road, which is a vast span of territory that is mysteriously not part of modern Archaeology and is war-torn even though there really isn’t much going on there economically these days. So why so much war and terrorism?
I find value in just about all religions, even Islam. If it helps people relate to higher concepts, it’s wonderful. But we must consider the political implications of faith and how they are often weaponized to rule large groups of people, and that is what I see emerging out of Hindu religions and Buddhism. Not by device, but by default. I heard a joke the other day about sperm that provoked all this contemplation that is actually very relevant. It becomes our business because just about every rock band that we’ve had for decades points to India and specifically the Hindu and Buddhist faith, and says we should calm ourselves down and be more like them. Even in Christianity, we are told to be more like Jesus, including the Jesus movement that came along during the hippie era, Jesus Christ Superstar, and the Helter Skelter cult. Jim Jones and many crazed religious lunatics have taken this passive value toward life and become maniacal dictators of personal destruction. I know a lot of Hindu people, and I’ve read all their religious texts, and I’m not a fan. I don’t like Gandhi. And I’m not a fan of Jesus offering to sacrifice himself for the benefit of all humanity. I think everyone has read it all wrong from the very start, and to understand that, we have to understand the vast influence that the Old Silk Road had in our history and what role it still plays today. My suggestion is that the war in the Near and Middle East is purposeful to conceal the vast history of the most enormous land mass on earth. Meanwhile, we’re supposed to keep our focus on just European history and the Renaissance, and the efforts of the Greeks and Romans to create civilization.
So the joke goes like this, and I’m sure many people have heard this, but I think it’s very relevant to these religions of peace that are so prevalent and wrong for the human race. A couple of sperm find themselves injected into a situation, and they are eager to find an egg for the fertilization process, as we understand these things from sex ed. It takes thousands of sperm, but only one will penetrate the egg, and a life is born—the miracle of life. So here are a few sperm injected into a sexual union, and they are looking for an egg. One is ambitious and works hard to beat the other sperm to the prize. But there is a wise sperm who is saying to the ambitious one, “Why are you working so hard.” Of course, the ambitious sperm says, “I want to be the first to get to the egg.” But the wise sperm says, “But dude, we’re inside some dude’s “exit.” There is no egg, so why try?” To frame a homosexual experience nicely. That is the essential message behind the Hindu faith, Zoroastrianism, as it developed in Iran in 600 BC. Buddhism as it developed in 500 BC. Jesus started Christianity due to studying in those many lost years in India, in the Kashmir region 500 years later. Islam would come along 600 years after that as an aggressive religion invented by the Arabs as a reaction to their continued occupation by the Romans, who went underground as an empire and became a church intent to rule over Europe and the world. We have falsely centered our study on the Mediterranean region when we should have looked at the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea all over the Himalayas. Many people were displaced by war, and they had developed a means to deal with its many disappointments—the religions of indifference, peace, and non-action.
So what are we dealing with here, a vast conspiracy of Bilderberg, World Economic Forum, or Rothchild manipulations who have constructed all these religions to control mass society and perpetually keep wars going in the region to prevent anybody from learning the truth? Because they want the masses to adopt peaceful beliefs and not fight back against their intrusion. I’d say it goes deeper into that and was best explained by Paul in the Book of Ephesians when these manipulators were identified as “principalities.” These creatures work to undo the world God made and stand against goodness as defined by the perpetuation of the human race, as chronicled in the Old Testament, which is older than all the mentioned religions. My argument is that these principalities have plotted against Yahweh for many thousands of years, and many of the conflicts that are dealt with today are directly associated. When Jesus and the rest of the Hindus sought to get away from the mess in the mountains of the Himalayas and started so many religions that developed along the Silk Road, they all missed the point. The goal of life is not to avoid reaching the egg and create a new life. All the sperm should at least try, even if they are in the wrong place. It’s not their fault; they should still try to do what they were designed to do: create a new life. The purpose of humans is to fight and develop as a result of battlefield victory, so in that regard, peace is bad for civilization. I can understand what Jesus and the Hindus were after. Buddhism is a great way to manage stress in life. But like the wise sperm who knew where he was and pointed out the pointless task in front of them, all creatures should fully embrace their job in the hopes that one of them will reach an egg and bring forth new life, either in a physical form or perhaps only in an idea. But in creation, everything should be dedicated. Which the Hindu perspective of “non-action” stands against.
Rich Hoffman