It will indeed test how much a Trump endorsement means to candidates such as J.D. Vance for the Ohio Senate. Because with less than a month out from the May 3rd primary election, J.D. Vance is fighting with several other candidates for the old Rob Portman seat, and among them, Mike Gibbons appears by polling to be in the lead. I have been on the fence with Jane Timken, Josh Mandel, and J.D. Vance from the beginning of the race. I’ve come to know all of them, and I like them. Mike Gibbons, for me, was a distant fourth place; he is way too squishy for me. But he’s not the worst in the world. For me, this race came down to who would be a good fighter who would push back against Mitch McConnell for the leadership role again and who could fight with MAGA in the senate and start to turn the tide in ways that Ted Cruz and Rand Paul have not yet managed to accomplish. I’ve had my eye on Josh Mandel for that kind of combat. He’s shown that he’s willing to fight and make things uncomfortable for opponents, which I think the next senate term will need. But obviously, Trump has other ideas. I’m sure Marjorie Taylor Green’s endorsement of J.D. Vance helped Trump’s decision, along with his son, Don Jr., and the billionaire tycoon, Peter Theil. I see a strategy evolving, and J.D. Vance wouldn’t be bad for that strategy, so while I was surprised to see President Trump endorse anybody in the senate race, particularly J.D. Vance, the overall strategy could be a good one. And it says a lot about what kind of message Trump intends to sell about his next term and the kind of America we are likely to be when we get there.
J.D. Vance has been a never-Trumper, much like Glenn Beck was. Trump has come around to forgiving Beck. It has taken me longer to even listen to Beck again, sometimes, because of how he was against Trump in 2016. Things were very personal back then. I was one of the few people who openly supported Trump during the Republican primary, and I remember what people said and did against him. I was not for the Trump dinner endorsement with Mitt Romney, which turned out to be such a disaster. As much as I like him, Trump has a personality trait that some might call a weakness; he wants to convert people over to his way of thinking. He likes to be liked, although he doesn’t let being liked alter his management style. So, he gets away with a weakness for love of likeability, and the J.D. Vance story is one of those Trump success stories. Does it look better in 2024 to put people close to you from the beginning, like Jane Timken or Josh Mandel, or to convert a friend from Never-Trumper to ally in the senate? Trump thinks the conversion is better. I think the loyalty is. I would have picked Josh Mandel if I was Trump because he was always with Trump, even when it wasn’t popular in 2016.
But Trump has plenty of people in his camp who were loyal when it was hard. What will likely mean more in uniting the country after the 2022 midterms shows that people who used to not like Trump are suddenly very pro-Trump, and that is what J.D. Vance has been? I’ve met J.D. Vance a few times through a very dear friend where I could talk to him personally. He’s a very nice young man who certainly has the kind of tenacity that you’d like to see representing Ohio in the senate. The movie based on his life, Hillbilly Elegy, and the book he wrote of the same title tells a very compelling story of a struggling blue-collar family from my backyard of Middletown, Ohio, that I think will keep Vance from being pulled into any corruption in Washington D.C. J.D. Vance doesn’t need politics to define him as a person, which I can’t say the same about Rob Portman in the beginning. I was with Portman when he first started; he needed politics to define him as a person. I set up the WLW interview where Portman debated a similar panel of Republicans all wanting to take a vacating House seat back in 1993 when his political career was just starting. I wondered about Portman even back then. He said all the right things. He hung around with the disparaged Ross Perot supporters as kind of a fringe Reform Party candidate. But as we saw over the next several decades, he became one of the biggest RINOs in Ohio. He worked too well with the far-left progressive Sharrod Brown. Obviously, we’d like to seem more of a fighter than a bridgebuilder for his replacement.
When it comes to politics, it’s always about how the game will be played, not necessarily how it is played today. With what we know, election fraud, government corruption, and globalism on every front, we are shocked to see what we always suspected was just under the surface. Trump looks to have a clear strategy for tackling the problem of Saving America. Not just Making it Great Again, but saving it from all three branches of government led by a knowledgeable executive branch, where an understanding of trade tariffs will be critical to those battles to come. Perhaps J.D. Vance will be able to go on prime-time television and sell just how America can get 10 trillion dollars in damages from China to begin to pay for the massive damage to our economy from the Covid attack. Or perhaps J.D. Vance will be another Romney dud. Whatever the case, what’s clear is that Trump isn’t playing it safe. If Trump wanted to show how many victories he could get with his endorsement, J.D. Vance was not the safe pick. It’s somewhat risky.
It should be an exciting primary. Trump’s visit to Delaware, Ohio, will undoubtedly help get voters out in what is typically a lite primary election. And higher voters mean more votes for the fewer establishment candidates, which is a marvelous thing. We should all be much better off than when we started the year. With a higher turnout, we’ll have a more representative government, so however things come out on the 3rd, we’ll have a good idea of how 2022 will shape up. Trump could have played it safe and stayed out of the primary until the results were announced, then supported the Republican, whoever it ended up being. But by picking J.D. Vance, he decided to make a high stake bet. And that is something I can respect, even if J.D. Vance wasn’t my pick. I can appreciate the chance Trump is willing to make when he didn’t need to make it. If he were a typical politician playing politics the way it is typically played, such an endorsement never would have happened. And since it did, we can at least see that Trump isn’t afraid to roll the dice for a big jackpot. And the winner of this jackpot means nothing less than Saving America for generations to come.
4 thoughts on “President Trump Endorses J.D. Vance: Rolling the dice for the ultimate jackpot, Saving America”
We are moving in different directions these days but tat’s okay. Our goal is the same.
The disgust so many have with Mr. Vance is not his “previous” stance on Trump. It has little to do with that. All reasonable people can change their views on a person. It’s human.
It’s his epic slandering of the millions that voted for him. Denigrating a whole sector of society because of their views is unforgivable for a future Senator or any politician. He held nothing back in that arena. That spoke volumes about his character, and that is something you can’t change. I don’t know if Vance will be on stage at Trumps rally as I don’t follow either of them, but I bet (and hope) he either gets booed off stage or hands Trump a raging NO if dropping his name. And don’t get me started on the straight-up creep factor. He is hard to look at. The hairs on the back of my next stand at attention when he speaks. I could expound further, but you girls out there know exactly what I’m talking about. A smile goes a long way but that might just make things worse.
That stunt with him bouncing around town on MTG’s heels and her showing him off like a shiny new puppy was cringe-worthy. What a huge disappointment, and she knows it.
I really hope Trump doesn’t run and I don’t think he will. I am not in that fan camp like the rest. He was a good president, not great. As a fiscal conservative first, his spending was a full-on bloodbath. His void for not removing so many traitors which was completely within his power, left many seeing him as hollowed out. Including me.
I hope he gets out of the way for DeSantis. He’s the ONLY one for the job that will need to be done in 2024. Trump has too many wretches in his ear.
DeSantis is certainly the future. He’s doing such a great job in Florida. If we get more governors like him, now that people can see how it should look, Trump could probably retire and enjoy his old age. He’s using the political capital he has now to help make things better. J.D. is not my idea of the future. But I do think he’ll be on stage at the rally. It will be interesting how the crowd reacts. It is interesting that MGT gave him an endorsement.
Its great to hear from you!
Thanks…and you! Sorry I’m late for reply.
I’m often in the Precinct Strategy chat for Ohio. There are hundreds from all over the state commenting there and it seems that those who don’t want Vance, won’t swallow hard and vote for him because of the endorsement. That’s bad, but neither will I. Almost everyone I see is Mandel. That leaves a terrible scenario. A split of Josh, JD and Gibbons. That puts Dolan, or most likely, Timpkin for the win. Portmans’ endorsement for her gave her enough edge, although in my circles it was the nail.
The flyer I got from Renacci yesterday had “Trump Endorsed” verbiage with a 2018 date. During a previous run.
That looks bad. And desperate. He should have left that off and I sent an email. That was 4 years ago. What do you think?
He should have had a Trump endorsement on Saturday. The smart money thinks Trump is still mad at him over losing that previous race. Its close. Hopefully with the high turnout, it will help Renacci. Low turnout will be the RINOs for sure, and they will vote DeWine.
I can’t see Dolan. He’s a nice guy. But not sexy at all. We’ll see. Lots of excitement with this one.